Initial Medicaid Implementation: Tennessee initially implemented Medicaid in June of 1969, three years following the initial implementation start date. In the first few years of the program, the state struggled with physician participation. The Tennessee Medical Association stated that their doctors were seeing low-income patients but were not filing the paperwork for Medicaid. In response the state doubled the reimbursement rate to encourage participation. When the state began the their Medicaid program they did not cover people who were “medically indigent.”
Key Medicaid Political Issues: Tennessee is most known for their TennCare program which was established through a waiver in 1994. The plan eliminated the state’s fee-for-service program and would put all existing Medicaid beneficiaries in managed care plans. Originally, the plan was available to all residents that qualified for Medicaid and for state residents who could not purchase private insurance for a number of reasons including because of a pre-existing condition. The program grew rapidly and within the first year the program began limiting eligibility to people who were eligible for Medicaid or ineligible for private insurance because of a pre-existing condition and met income requirements. In 2003 after a change in Governors the TennCare program was determined to not be financially viable and in 2005 the program guidelines were changed to reduce the number of people who would be covered by the program. 190,000 people were removed from the TennCare roles. The changes also reduced the number of medical services and prescription drugs that the remaining beneficiaries could use.
Medicaid Expansion Implementation: As of January of 2019, Tennessee has not implemented Medicaid expansion. The state has debated whether to take up the Medicaid expansion several times and came close to expanding in 2015. The state has proposed work requirements for the existing Medicaid populations, primarily parents and certain adult caregivers, that would require them to work or meet community engagement requirements for a minimum of 20 hours per a week. The bill was criticized for the inclusion of a provision that would use TANF funds to pay for the administrative costs of work requirements. CMS has not approved work requirements for any state that has not expanded Medicaid. In the past, Tennessee law makers have proposed other restrictive Medicaid expansion policies including block granting Medicaid. During the initial rollout of the Affordable Care Act’s coverage expansion and HealthCare.gov the Tennessee Medicaid eligibility system faced some challenges and there were significant delays transferring applications from HealthCare.gov to be processed by the state.
General facts about Tennessee Medicaid: Medicaid program name: TennCare CHIP Program name: CoverKids Separate or combined CHIP: Combination Medicaid Enrollment: 1.38 million (2018 estimate) Total Medicaid Spending: $9.1 billion (FY 2017 estimate) Share of total population covered by Medicaid: 20% Share of Children covered by Medicaid: 43% (estimate) Share of Medicaid that is Children and Adults: 72% Share of Spending on Elderly and people with disabilities: 54% Share of Nursing Facility Residents covered by Medicaid: 60% FMAP: 65.21% Expansion state: No Number of people in expansion: N/A Work Requirement: Under Review
Initial Medicaid Implementation: South Dakota began their Medicaid program in October of 1967. When the program began the state did not provide coverage for people who were “medically needy.” As of 1963 South Dakota had not participated in the Kerr Mills program that proceeded the Medicare program. The state had submitted a plan to begin a program that would provide medical aid to seniors using federal funding, however the program had not been approved by the federal government by the time that conversations about beginning the Medicare program were in full swing. The plan proposed by the state would provide people who were eligible for coverage under the MMA program health insurance rather than directly paying for the services and expenses that these beneficiaries accrue. Key Medicaid Political Issues: South Dakota has a high portion of the population living in rural parts of the state. This makes access to health care services difficult. South Dakota also has a high portion of the population who are Native Americans and receive Medicaid through categorical eligibility. South Dakota provides one of the lowest eligibility levels for pregnant women, infants, children and lower-middle income families through CHIP. South Dakota has a high rate of providers who accept Medicaid coverage with 100% of primary care physicians and hospitals accepting Medicaid in 2009. Most nursing homes and dentists in the state also accepted Medicaid patients. The state ranks second lowest in Medicaid administration expenditures. Due to the state’s small population, pilot programs in long-term care are able to affect a small population of beneficiaries that represent a larger share of the state’s expenditures. Medicaid Expansion Implementation: As of January 2019, South Dakota has not expanded their Medicaid program under the Affordable Care Act. The state has been controlled by both a Republican governor and legislature since the option was made available in 2012. It is estimated that roughly 26,000 people are in the coverage gap or fall below 100% of the federal poverty level. The issue has been at the center of statewide politics in both the 2014 and 2018 gubernatorial elections. In 2014 Governor Daugaard requested an expansion of Medicaid up to 100% of the federal poverty level, or what is known as a partial expansion. CMS decided that Medicaid expansion was only available to states that expanded Medicaid up to the 138% of FPL. At the same time that Governor Daugaard was making this request, the state was running a budget surplus because the Medicaid enrollment was 10% lower than expected in the existing Medicaid program, even following the expansion of coverage due to the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. In 2014 a state panel also decided that South Dakota would not become the first state in the nation to allow people to vote on whether or not the state could expand Medicaid coverage. The Senate Affairs committee must determine whether or not ballot initiatives can appear before the voters.
General facts about South Dakota Medicaid: Medicaid program name: Medicaid CHIP Program name: CHIP Separate or combined CHIP: Combination Medicaid Enrollment: 116,000 (2018 estimate) Total Medicaid Spending: $859 million (FY 2017 estimate) Share of total population covered by Medicaid: 15% (estimate) Share of Children covered by Medicaid: 33% (estimate) Share of Medicaid that is Children and Adults: 76% Share of Spending on Elderly and people with disabilities: 63% Share of Nursing Facility Residents covered by Medicaid: 50% (Estimate) FMAP: 57.62% Expansion state: No Number of people in expansion:N/A Work Requirement: Under review
Initial Medicaid Implementation: South Carolina implemented their Medicaid program in July of 1968. When the program began the state did not offer a program for medically needy individuals. The state had unique needs because of the high rates of poverty. Despite this issue and the less professional state government, the state participated in the Kerr-Mills program. The state only had an average of 411 monthly members in the previous program with approximately 3,000 individuals assisted by the program annually. The program spent approximately $1.2 million over the course of the program’s existence. Key Medicaid Political Issues: South Carolina has made significant progress in the area of Medicaid and maternal health. The state has implemented several programs including the Birth Outcome Initiative which is a project with the Medicaid agency and commercial insurers that established a policy of non-payment for early elective deliveries. The state saw significant savings from this initiative and through more community care programs that were established to treat women before, during, and after, childbirth. Despite these innovative efforts to improve maternal mortality, the state has been a leader in working to end payments to planned parenthood and other abortion providers from receiving state Medicaid funds. South Carolina has a high rate of poverty, meaning that the state receives a high matching rate for their program and more people are eligible for the income based categories of eligibility. South Carolina renamed their Department of Health and Human Services Finance Commission to the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services in 1995. Medicaid Expansion Implementation: South Carolina has not expanded Medicaid. The state has been under the control of both Republican governors and a Republican dominated legislature since 2012. In 2018 discussion began over whether the state would expand Medicaid through a ballot initiative following the successful attempts in other states. The ability for the state to expand through this option is doubtful because the state needs the legislature to pass the ballot initiative in order for the option to appear on the 2020 statewide ballot. In 2017 the South Carolina legislature accidentally passed a resolution in support of Medicaid expansion as part of a resolution welcoming the new governor. The legislature quickly reversed the resolution. General facts about South Carolina Medicaid: Medicaid program name: Medicaid CHIP Program name: Healthy Connections Kids Separate or combined CHIP: Medicaid Expansion Medicaid Enrollment: 1.02 million (2018 estimate) Total Medicaid Spending: $6.2 billion (FY 2017 estimate) Share of total population covered by Medicaid: 19% Share of Children covered by Medicaid: 40% (estimate) Share of Medicaid that is Children and Adults: 77% Share of Spending on Elderly and people with disabilities: 55% Share of Nursing Facility Residents covered by Medicaid: 62.5% FMAP: 70.7% Expansion state: No Number of people in expansion: N/A Work Requirement: None
Initial Medicaid Implementation: Rhode Island began their Medicaid program in July of 1966, within the first year that the state could implement Medicaid.
When the program was initially started, it was estimated that 8% of the population would be eligible for coverage. Following the change that limited Medicaid federal reimbursement to spending for people that earned less than 150% of AFDC rates, Rhode Island reduced Medicaid eligibility to meet those rates and continue to receive federal reimbursement. At one point early in the Medicaid implementation, a dispute arose between the optometrists and ophthalmoligists. The Boston regional office held resolve the dispute which was a rare intervention of the office in state matters. The dispute rested in differences in payment rates and coverage of services between the two professions. Key Medicaid Political Issues: Rhode Island has had a focus on treating mental health conditions and children’s health care for a number of years. The state has focused this priority in the development on their medical home model. Rhode Island has been an early adopter to several health care benefits including transgender health care services, Hepatitis C treatment and expanded treatment for opioid addiction. Since 2009 the state has occupied under a single global waiver. The waiver has allowed the state flexibility in how it provides benefits, especially for long-term care services. The waiver has a high limit on the budget neutrality limits meaning that the state can provide enhanced benefits without having to significantly reduce services for other beneficiaries or in other parts of the Medicaid program. Medicaid Expansion Implementation: Rhode Island expanded Medicaid with sign ups beginning in October of 2013 with coverage beginning in January of 2014. The state was under the control of a Democratic governor and legislature and is solidly Democratic in presidential voting so the choice to expand saw little debate in the legislature or governor’s office. The Rhode Island Public Expenditure Council, a non profit group that reviews economic proposals by the state, looked into the state’s decision to expand and determined that the state could save money on existing programs and increased coverage and economic activity, but the extent of the implementation of the proposal was unclear and what the expenditures would be in out years when the state had to pay could be significant depending on the enrollment effort.
General facts about Rhode Island Medicaid: Medicaid program name: Medicaid CHIP Program name: Rite Care Separate or combined CHIP: Separate Medicaid Enrollment: 308,000 (2018 estimate) Total Medicaid Spending: $2.6 billion (FY 2017 Estimate) Share of total population covered by Medicaid: 20% (estimate) Share of Children covered by Medicaid: 37.5% (estimate) Share of Medicaid that is Children and Adults: 80% Share of Spending on Elderly and people with disabilities: 59% Share of Nursing Facility Residents covered by Medicaid: 60% (estimate) FMAP: 52.95% Expansion state: Yes Number of people in expansion: 62,000 Work Requirement: No